Cricket
-> Specials
-> World Cup 2003
-> Columns
-> Report
'Indians lost the match in the first 10 over'
By
Greg Chappell
Monday, March 24 2003 15:57 Hrs (IST)
India lost the World Cup final inside the first 10 overs of the match against
Australia but it has made considerable ground during the tournament.
Australia proved the pundits correct when it added to its impressive recent record
of wins by taking the World Cup final in a canter. Adam Gilchrist intimidated the
Indian bowlers on a wicket that offered the seam bowlers more than a modicum of
assistance and from there it was all downhill for India.
With each run made by the Australian batsmen the pressure was building on the
Indian batsmen, especially Sachin Tendulkar.
One thing about this Australian team is that, apart from its talent, it is the best-
prepared team in world cricket. It came to this World Cup with the intention of
peaking for the final.
Everything it has done in the tournament was aimed at being on top of its game for
the Wanderers finale. Even the set back of losing Shane Warne, then Jason Gillespie,
has not been allowed to interrupt its preparation.
Hogg and Bichel slipped into the team seamlessly. Ponting and Buchanan would not
allow any negative thoughts to enter the minds of anyone involved with the touring
party.
Preparation is all about arriving for the start of a game at the perfect level of
arousal. Too little arousal and you can feel tired and flat. Too much arousal and
the adrenalin will race too much for you to focus on the micro level.
Even focussing on the macro level is difficult. Very soon you will
have exhausted all your energy.
One of the main dangers for a player leading into a big game such as this is that he
will have played the game over and over in his mind before the actual event. By the
time he arrives at the ground he is mentally exhausted from having tossed and turned
for hour after hour playing imaginary innings or bowling make believe overs. We have
all made that mistake!
It is only experience that teaches you to save your energy for when it is required.
Either you learn that lesson early or your career will be a brief one.
Australia was the more experienced of these two teams with six players having played
in the winning team in 1999 and it showed up early. The Indian players appeared much
more on edge than their Australian counterparts.
India arrived at the final with great hopes of lifting the trophy from the supremely
confident and focussed Australians. The confidence gained from eight wins in a row
since its loss to Australia had given it good reason for
Its optimism.
Had not India's recent victories been more decisive than Australia's wins over New
Zealand and Sri Lanka? The counter to that was that it had not batted against an
attack as powerful as that possessed by Australia nor had
It bowled against as formidable a batting line up as the boys from down-under.
Saurav Ganguly would have been delighted to have won the toss on a wicket sporting
some moisture from heavy overnight rain. He will have wanted to avoid facing the
likes of Lee and McGrath for one thing, but it was also a chance for his attack to
put some pressure on the Australian top-order.
After all, had not the Australians been struggling to get a good start? What is
often overlooked when sending the opposition in to bat is how much pressure it puts
on the bowlers. The expectation is that they should take early wickets. This can
increase the tension that, in turn, makes it hard to bowl with freedom and precision.
Some bowlers try too hard in this situation. Others are prone to succumb to the
pressure. On this occasion Javagal Srinath was the former and Zaheer Khan was the
latter.
As much as the Australians say they do not target particular bowlers, Gilchrist
seemed to have Zaheer Khan firmly in his sights. Khan obliged by bowling in the
areas he likes. Mind you, there are not many areas he does not like! Wide in short
or full of a length will do him most times.
Khan tried all three plus a few wides and no balls for good measure. It was not his
day! There were enough balls bouncing and seaming to suggest
that winning the toss was an advantage.
The trouble was that the bowlers could not hit a line or a length. By the time
Gilchrist had reached his fifty and Australia its 100 inside 15 overs, the Indian
team body language told a dismal tale.
A score of 350 plus was on the cards and you could feel the noose tightening on the
Indian batsmen. More than ever India was going to require another masterpiece from
the little master. He cannot always oblige. He is only human after all!
What this score did for the Australian bowlers was to take the pressure off them. A
few early errors were not likely to be fatal so they could steam in and try to
unsettle the Indian openers.
There was still enough moisture in the wicket to offer the new ball bowlers some
assistance so batting was not easy against an attack that was able to do what the
Indian bowlers had been incapable of doing. Bowling a line and length.
Brett Lee was intent on destruction and Glenn McGrath was accurate as they set about
strangling the Indian reply. Tendulkar was intent on fighting fire with fire.
He hit McGrath for four from a short delivery, but once he was dismissed aiming a
second pull shot at McGrath the trophy was on its way to Australia once again.
Sehwag and Ganguly lived dangerously as they took to Lee and McGrath and while it
was exciting the risks were high.
As clouds gathered Ganguly may well have been thinking of the runs required before
the 25 over cut off. If he was, there was some method in the madness. If not the
method was questionable. It looked as if the captain felt the bowlers had left them
with too much to do.
Once the skipper finally imploded, and was quickly followed by Kaif, it appeared
that he had left the rest of the batters with way too much to do. Sehwag and Dravid
prospered for a while, but the Australians could taste victory as they closed in for
the kill.
This Australian team has lifted the bar a little higher. No other country is
remotely close to having the combination of infrastructure and preparation that
Australia possesses. Until such time as they do, or until some of the
giants of this Australian team retire, I cannot see anyone matching their
combination of talent and commitment to excellence.
India has made considerable ground during this tournament. Ashish Nehra is a new
star on the horizon and some of the young batsmen show signs of developing into
excellent players and Tendulkar is still Tendulkar.
There is much to look forward to for the Indian supporters, but they are still a
long way short of being able to match the overall strength of this wonderful
Australian team.
PTI
Extras:
Somebody has to beat the Aussie says Ganguly
Aussies to get public reception in Perth: ACB
Catch us if you can: Buchanan
It's not money, it's the standards that is dear: Ponting
I made the right call insists Ganguly
|